Use your own set of privacy addons like Umatrix/Ematrix, Decentraleye, Nocript, Ublock origin that gives you much better privacy. Remember that developers whitelist trackers many times from built in protections. The most important reason people chose GNU IceCat is: It is part of the GNU Project. In the questionWhat are the best desktop web browsers GNU IceCat is ranked 4th while Iridium Browser is ranked 13th. Though vanilla versions have started limit user control but many forks still respect.Īnd do not fall for built in privacy protections scam. 169 42 When comparing Iridium Browser vs GNU IceCat, the Slant community recommends GNU IceCat for most people. If you want something else UXP browsers like Palememe and and Basilik based browsers are great alternatives. If you really need to use big browser use either Ungoogled Chromium or Librewolf (Firefox based). That is same fingerprinting as other violators.Īlso their developers don't care about user concerns.Īnd forget about building it from source since there is no full source code that makes it not to be open source. It sends telemetry that includes your profile unique ID, screen resolution and your IP. Here some more sauce to support my findings Once safebrowsing blocks one they add another. Safebrowsing always been obsolete since malware sites got so many domains ready. Pros of Iridium Browser Like Chrome, Iridium is very user friendly. The only big difference is vastly improved security and streamlined interface, removing the usual Chrome bloatware. Also developers refuse to address issue saying "it only downloads them for local use". Built to be a safer version of Chrome, Iridium’s source-code and features are nearly identical to Chrome. Why safe browsing is issue? Since browser needs to connect on Google servers to download file and that means excess connection. If you want to harden Firefox, you have this amazing guide or use Ungoogled Chromium. Waterfox a fork of Firefox, Icecat or Iridium are solid alternatives. This has been answered over and over again, but browsers do change so here are some options. That still exist on latest version of iridium. First, you can search the /privacy reddit for more in-depth detailed conversations. It operates on all major operating systems and devices, including Android, iOS, macOS, Linux, and Windows. Iridium got one problem that developers wont address and that is google safebrowsing Mozilla Firefox is an open-source private web browser that has been helping users to maintain online anonymity for the last 13 years. And librejs is pretty useless for privacy actually as it only cares from javascript licence and not what JS does in your system. brosource( basilisk-bin cliqz cyberfox-bin slimjet icecat iridium-deb liri-browser-git otter-browser yandex-browser-beta vivaldi waterfox newmoon-uxp-git. Only thing it adds is libreJS that can also be downloaded other browsers. GNU icecat is okayish but I rather recommend librewolf. But, fwiw, if your goal is privacy, for nearly everyone, Brave is dramatically better.Other browser alternatives I suggest reviewing are Epic Privacy Browser, GNU Icecat, Iridium, and Vivaldi.įirst one I never heard about but that name suggest it is not private at all. Many of Brave's protections are difficult to impossible to do apply at the extension layer, and are often circumventable at the extension layer (this is particularly true of extensions that try to provide fingerprinting protection)Īnyway, hope thats useful in some way. Privacy extensions that modify network requests or modify the DOM are detectable by pages, and so are a very high fidelity fingerprint surface. You can add extension to Firefox to get some (though not all) of Brave's protections, butĪdding multiple extensions makes you look very unique. By default Firefox provides weak fingerprinting protections. Firefox blocks a very little out of the box, and mostly uses lists to decide where to allow storage.īrave randomizes a large number of fingerprintable endpoints by default. Brave Browser Tor Browser Firefox Browser Iridium Browser Epic Privacy Browser GNU IceCat Browser Other honorable mentions. Firefox allows all storage in 3rd party frames unless all the following are true a) the origin is on disconnect, b) this is the 6th time the origin has appeared as a third party iframe (the first 5 times are always allowed)īrave blocks trackers and ads out of the box (we ship 100% the same lists as uBlock Origin, plus some Brave custom rules). Here is a partial, very-incomplete list of reasons why:īrave by default blocks all storage in third party frames (i.e. This isn't a criticism of Firefox, they're a great project that has made different decisions for different tradeoffs, but unambiguously Brave is _far_ more private than Firefox. If you are interested in privacy, Brave is dramatically, unambiguously better than Firefox. I'm the privacy researcher at Brave, so take this with a grain of salt, but this is incorrect. If you are more concerned about your online privacy
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |